Home / Agencies / NRC / 2025-14215
Proposed Rule

Licensing Safety Analysis for Loss-of-Coolant Accidents

Agency
NRC
Document Number
2025-14215
Published
July 28, 2025
Effective Date
-

Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is denying a petition for rulemaking (PRM), dated August 1, 2022, submitted by Ralph O. Meyer. The petition requested that the NRC amend its regulations regarding the licensing safety analysis for loss-of-coolant accidents. The petition was docketed on August 1, 2022, and was assigned Docket No. PRM-50-124. The NRC is denying the petition because the NRC is addressing emergency core cooling system performance with a risk- informed and performance-based regulatory approach rather than a deterministic approach as suggested by the petitioner.

Federal Register Source

This document is published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration. Access the full regulatory text, preamble, and docket comments below.

View Full Text on FederalRegister.gov →

Opens in new tab · federalregister.gov

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 2025-14215 Federal Register document?
Document 2025-14215 is a Proposed Rule published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the Federal Register on July 28, 2025. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is denying a petition for rulemaking (PRM), dated August 1, 2022, submitted by Ralph O. Meyer. The petition requested that the NRC amend its regulations regarding the licensing safety analysis for loss-of-coolant accidents. The petition was docketed on August 1, 2022, and was assigned Docket No. PRM-50-124. The NRC is denying the petition because the NRC is addressing emergency core cooling system performance with a risk- informed and performance-based regulatory approach rather than a deterministic approach as suggested by the petitioner. View the original at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/07/28/2025-14215/licensing-safety-analysis-for-loss-of-coolant-accidents.
Is document 2025-14215 an economically significant rule?
No. Document 2025-14215 is not classified as economically significant under Executive Order 12866. Economically significant rules require OIRA review and are estimated to have impacts of $100 million or more per year.

Other Rules from NRC

Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors; Correction
Final Rule · Jul 2026
Modernizing Reactor Licensing, Safety Oversight, and Siting Practices; Correction
Proposed · Jul 2026
Modernizing Package Certification Requirements
Proposed · Jul 2026
Reducing Barriers to Medical Use Licensing
Proposed · Jul 2026
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Holtec International HI-STORM Flood/Wind System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment No. 10
Final Rule · Jul 2026
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Holtec International HI-STORM Flood/Wind System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1032, Amendment No. 10
Proposed · Jul 2026
View all Nuclear Regulatory Commission rules →

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official state legislatures, IAPP, NCSL, and federal regulatory trackers. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainRegWatch

Every figure on PlainRegWatch is rendered from curated state legislative and Federal Register source data, no number is typed in by an editor. Figures on this page come from the curated five-category archive. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Tracker scores and rule counts are curated records in five tracked categories - not enforcement strength, legal advice, a complete inventory of US law, or a live bill-status feed.